June 16-17, 2006 - ARCHIVE

Augustana College, Rock Island, IL

NI Synod Home

2006 Assembly Home

Registration

Schedule

Special Guests

Youth Assembly

Resolutions

Photos
Directions

Voting Members Info

Displays

Fees

Bulletin of Reports

Augsburg Fortress

Elections

Highlights

R-5 passed

A CALL FOR CONVERSATION AND COMPASSION
ON IMMIGRANT ISSUES

WHEREAS, God calls us in the Scriptures to welcome and show hospitality to the stranger, the alien and the sojourner in our midst, since we were once sojourners in Egypt; and

WHEREAS, our Lord Jesus Christ continually reached out to the outcast and oppressed in his society offering acceptance, affirmation, forgiveness and healing, and calls us to do the same; and

WHEREAS, our nation is presently involved in efforts to examine and reform our national immigration policies; and

WHEREAS, some are calling for harsh punishment for those who have ignored or violated our present confusing and often inconsistently applied immigration policies, including those who offer humanitarian aid and spiritual comfort to these often desperate people; and

WHEREAS, racism has often been a factor in the opposition to more caring and humane immigration policies and enforcement; and

WHEREAS, our Presiding Bishop, Mark Hanson, together with the president of the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service has prepared a statement offering Christian perspectives and principles that should inform our national immigration policies; and

WHEREAS, this statement (copy attached) has been endorsed by 58 Bishops of our Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; and

WHEREAS, many of the congregations of our Northern Illinois Synod serve communities with significant immigrant populations; therefore be it

RESOLVED, that the congregations of the Northern Illinois Synod make their members aware of the statements and guidance from our Church, and provide opportunities for information and discussion of immigration issues among the youth and adults of our congregations, and encourage them to advocate for immigration reform that reflects the Christian and humane principles; and be it further

RESOLVED, that our congregations be encouraged to seek ways to welcome, affirm and support the immigrant populations in their own communities, those who are the aliens and sojourners in our midst today; and be it further

RESOLVED, that this and other resolutions on immigration issues be published and distributed in Spanish and other pertinent languages so that our church’s positions may be widely known in immigrant communities.

Submitted by: The Anti-Racism Team of the Northern Illinois Synod

Contact Person:  Pr. Frank Samuelson

Date Submitted: May 11, 2006


Action of the Resolution Committee 

Date of Action:  May 16, 2006

Action Taken:  Recommend the Resolution 


Evangelical Lutherans Call for Fair and Just Immigration Reform

Statement of     Mark S. Hanson    Presiding Bishop, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

       Ralston H. Deffenbaugh, Jr.    President, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service

St. Paul calls us to “[W]elcome one another, just as Christ has welcomed you, to the glory of God” (Romans 15:7).  Our Lutheran tradition calls on us to uphold the Biblical mandate to welcome the stranger.  The Bible teaches us “When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien.  The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt (Leviticus 19: 33-34).”  In Matthew 25, Jesus himself identifies with aliens: “I was a stranger and you welcomed me.” 

In difficult and threatening times, churches and all Christians have an obligation to stand with the word of God against those who use fear to deny fundamental human rights and dignity to the stranger in our midst.  We, the presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), and the president of the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS), call on all people of faith to oppose attempts at immigration reform as currently proposed.

There are those who may wish to characterize this position as weakening our national vigilance against terrorism; it does not, and it would be wrong to so imply.  The ELCA has a very strong statement regarding the threat of terrorism and so advocates, but we believe the current immigration reform effort does not protect this country.  Rather, it denies fundamental human rights and limits the ministry of the church to those residing in our land. 

We reject “enforcement only” legislation that separates families; that criminalizes undocumented men, women and children; that criminalizes churches, their pastors and lay people who minister to the alien in their communities; that denies a legal path to permanent residence for millions already in the United States working for our companies and businesses; and denies fair treatment for farm workers who provide our daily bread.

We therefore request the following specific changes in legislation presently under consideration:

Oppose the criminalization of the church, its ministers and its members, who provide humanitarian aid to undocumented immigrants.  The current criminalization provision provides for seizure of assets used to further these humanitarian acts. 

Oppose provisions which criminalize undocumented presence.  Such provisions raise punishment of immigration violations out of proportion to the nature of the offense, punishing immigrants who seek only to work or remain with their families with sentences of up to two years.  Provisions relating to criminal gangs should be amended to exclude children whose participation is involuntary, or who are fleeing the gangs.  Each case must be considered on its own merits. 

Provide a path to permanence for individuals currently residing and working in the United States as well as their families.  A fair program to bring these individuals out of the shadows and in line to obtain legal status must be a part of any lasting solution as the failure to do so can only result in the creation of a vulnerable permanent underclass, unable to fully participate in society.  Essential to such a solution is a worker visa program which unites families and provides an opportunity for workers to earn a permanent place in American society. 

Ensure basic constitutional due process rights in the enforcement of our laws.  We recognize the need to increase the security of our borders, but we cannot accept the curtailment of fundamental due process rights.  Language in the bill would wall off access to the courts in many situations where it is now possible, eliminating checks and balances which form the basis of America’s democracy.  Recent decisions by Federal Appeals Courts have shown that judicial review is necessary to ensure the process is functioning properly.  Other sections of the bill allow officials to deny benefits or even citizenship based on broad, poorly defined criteria, without recourse to appeal.  Detention could be extended almost indefinitely, with little or no opportunity for appeal.  Transparency and accountability in decision making has been a touchstone of American government since its founding, and should not be abandoned now.  

Include in the legislation the bipartisan “Agricultural Job Opportunities Act” for farm workers, a measure negotiated by growers, agricultural employers and farm workers to create an “earned adjustment” program enabling some undocumented farm workers and H-2A guest workers to obtain temporary immigration status with the possibility of permanence and that revises the existing H-2A worker program.

Finally, we oppose the rush-to-judgment atmosphere that is currently surrounding this issue.  Complex language that would affect the lives of millions of people is being discussed in back rooms of Senate chambers, with insufficient time for understanding, public discussion, and reasoned consideration of the consequences.

As members of a church with immigrants, and with roots in immigrant churches in a nation of immigrants, we urge the Congress to make these corrections to the bill, or to reject it.

ELCA Bishops Who Endorse the Statement                                                                   3/27/06 

ALABAMA - Bishop Ronald B. Warren;  ALASKA - Bishop Ronald D.  Martinson;  ARIZONA - The Rev. Alton Zenker, Interim Synod Bishop;  ARKANSAS - Bishop Floyd M. Schoenhals; CALIFORNIA - Bishop Murray D. Finck; Bishop David G. Mullen; Bishop Dean W. Nelson;  COLORADO - Bishop Allan C. Bjornberg;  CONNECTICUT - Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  DELAWARE - Bishop H. Gerard Knoche;  FLORIDA - Bishop Edward R. Benoway;  GEORGIA - Bishop Ronald B. Warren;  HAWAII- Bishop Murray D. Finck;  ILLINOIS - Bishop Warren D. Freiheit; Bishop Paul R. Landahl; Bishop Gary M. Wollersheim;  INDIANA - Bishop James R. Stuck;  IOWA - Bishop Philip L. Hougen; Bishop Michael A. Last; Bishop Steven L. Ullestad;  KANSAS - Bishop Gerald L. Mansholt;  KENTUCKY - Bishop James R. Stuck;  LOUISIANA - Bishop Paul J. Blom; Bishop Kevin S. Kanouse;  MAINE - Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  MARYLAND - Bishop Ralph W. Dunkin; Bishop H. Gerard Knoche; Bishop Theodore F. Schneider;  MASSACHUSETTS -    Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  MICHIGAN - Bishop Gary L. Hansen; Bishop John H. K. Schreiber;  MINNESOTA - Bishop Jon V. Anderson; Bishop Craig E. Johnson; Bishop Peter Rogness; Bishop Peter Strommen; Bishop Harold L. Usgaard;  MISSISSIPPI - Bishop Ronald B. Warren;  MISSOURI - Bishop Gerald L. Mansholt;  NEBRASKA - Bishop David L. defreeze;  NEVADA - Bishop David G. Mullen; The Rev. Alton Zenker, Interim Synod Bishop;  NEW HAMPSHIRE - Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  NEW JERSEY - Bishop E. Roy Riley;  NEW MEXICO - Bishop Allan C. Bjornberg;  NEW YORK - Bishop Stephen P. Bouman; Bishop Marie C. Jerge; Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  OHIO - Bishop Marcus C. Lohrmann; Bishop Callon W. Holloway Jr.;  OKLAHOMA - Bishop Floyd M. Schoenhals; OREGON - Bishop Paul R. Swanson;  PENNSYLVANIA - Bishop Carol S. Hendrix; Bishop Ralph Jones; Bishop A. Donald Main; Bishop Donald J. McCoid;                Bishop Gregory R. Pile; Bishop David R. Strobel;  RHODE ISLAND - Bishop Margaret G. Payne;  SOUTH CAROLINA - Bishop David A. Donges;  TENNESSEE - Bishop Ronald B. Warren;  TEXAS - Bishop Allan C. Bjornberg; Bishop Paul J. Blom; Bishop Kevin S. Kanouse; Bishop Ray Tiemann;  UTAH - Bishop Allan C. Bjornberg;  VERMONT - Bishop Margaret G. Payne; VIRGINIA - Bishop James F. Mauney; Bishop Theodore F. Schneider;  WASHINGTON - Bishop Wm. Chris Boerger;  Bishop Robert D. Hofstad;  WASHINGTON D.C. - Bishop Theodore F. Schneider;  WEST VIRGINIA - Bishop Ralph W. Dunkin;  WISCONSIN - Bishop George G. Carlson; Bishop James A. Justman; Bishop Paul W. Stumme-Diers; Bishop April Ulring Larson;  WYOMING - Bishop Allan C. Bjornberg;  BAHAMAS - Bishop Edward R. Benoway;  PUERTO RICO - Bishop Margarita Martínez;  U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS - Bishop Margarita Martínez

[editorial note:  some synods cover more than one state/area; some states have more than one synod]


Northern Illinois Synod, 103 West State Street, Rockford, IL 61101
Phone: 815-964-9934
Fax: 815-964-2295 welcome@nisynod.org

Questions or comments about this website may be directed to Karin Graddy, Northern Illinois Synod Communication Director